You are viewing category archives: Medical Community

Just Say No To Flu Vaccines

October 6, 2009


From Dr. Mercola:
The swine flu is simply another flu. It is not unusually deadly.

This is the first time both seasonal and pandemic flu vaccines will be administered. Both seasonal flu and swine flu vaccines will require two inoculations. This is because single inoculations have failed to produce sufficient antibodies. This is an admission that prior flu vaccines were virtually useless. Can you trust them this time?

Adjuvants are added to vaccines to boost production of antibodies but may trigger autoimmune reactions. Some adjuvants are mercury (thimerosal), aluminum and squalene. Why would you sign a consent form for your children to be injected with mercury, which is even more brain-toxic than lead?

This is the first year mock vaccines have been used to gain FDA approval. The vaccines that have been tested are not the same vaccines your children will be given.

Over-vaccination is a common practice now in America. American children are subjected to 29 vaccines by the age of two. Meanwhile, veterinarians have backed off of repeat vaccination in dogs because of observed side effects.

Modern medicine has no explanation for autism, despite its continued rise in prevalence. Yet autism is not reported among Amish children who go unvaccinated.

Researchers are warning that over-use of the flu vaccine and anti-flu drugs like Tamiflu and Relenza can apply genetic pressure on flu viruses and then they are more likely to mutate into a more deadly strain.

Most seasonal influenza A (H1N1) virus strains tested from the United States and other countries are now resistant to Tamiflu (oseltamivir). Tamiflu has become a nearly worthless drug against seasonal flu.

Public health officials are irresponsible in their omission of any ways to strengthen immunity against the flu. No options outside of problematic vaccines and anti-flu drugs are offered, despite the fact there is strong evidence that vitamins C and D activate the immune system and the trace mineral selenium prevents the worst form of the disease

Healing Cancer documentary review

September 29, 2009

healing cancer
Healing Cancer is an information packed documentary that is trying to tell the very important hidden story behind Cancer. Through great archival footage, Mike Anderson has done his research and makes valid judgements with the statistics available today. Inspired by his father’s death from cancer and the fact that his doctor would have gone to jail if he prescribed natural treatments for his disease, Anderson dives down the rabbit hole of the state of cancer disease care in this country. Having done research into this field myself, I can attest to the truth he has uncovered.

Why do we use cancer causing treatments to cure cancer?

90% of cancers are completely immune to chemotherapy yet it is still the main avenue of treatment. Chemotherapy is effective in 2-3% of all cancer patients, primarily the rarest kind of cancer. Not much has changed in the last 20 years.

Surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy…seldom produce a cure.

-American Cancer Society 2007

Yet 60% get radiation, 67% get surgery, and 80% get chemotherapy. But why do we continue this course of treatment? $$$$$$$$.

Chemotherapy doesn’t work well because there will always be a few cancer cells that are resistant and will slowly grow back over the next 5 years. You cannot heal with poison. So there is only a continuation of the original disease. When you deal with local tumors you miss the global disease in the body. Chemo raises the incidence of secondary tumors – and this is because chemo is one of the most toxic drug out there. Most oncologists would not take chemo if they themselves had cancer even though the FDA considers it safe and effective. A major side effect of chemo is death. How do we give dangerous toxic treatments to patients without showing any results better than a placebo sugar pill?

Cancer is the only disease that is considered cured if you live for 5 years. The National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society have been claiming that the cure for cancer is right around the corner since 1953! How many billions have been funneled down this path with little progress in the treatment of cancer. Cancer is the number one disease killer at around 500,000 US citizens a year.

The American Cancer Society’s dismal rating (27 cents from every dollar goes to research in cancer while 63 cents gets eaten by the charity itself) from Charity Navigator:
Organizational Efficiency
Program Expenses 70.4%
Administrative Expenses 9.3%
Fundraising Expenses 20.2%
Fundraising Efficiency $0.18
Efficiency Rating (27.04)
Organizational Capacity
Primary Revenue Growth 7.2%
Program Expenses Growth 7.7%
Working Capital Ratio (years) 1.05
Capacity Rating (27.71)

The National Cancer Institute, backed by the American Cancer Society has blocked alternative research and natural treatments for decades.

Everyone should know that the ‘war on cancer’ is largerly a fraud, and that the National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society are derelict in their duties to the people who support them.

– Linus Pauling, Ph.D. Nobel Prize winner

The American Medical Association has done its job destroying all competition for the allopathic doctors, and has even been convicted of conspiracy to destroy the Osteopaths, Chiropractors, and Homeopaths by the supreme court of this country. Operating under the guise of truly providing health care for the citizens of this country, this health care system is nothing more then a highly profitable palliative care delivery system which has conveniently named the disease, developed patented synthetic treatments for said disease, and monoplized and privatized the system for caring for this disease.

The placebo effect is the bastardization of the human bodies natural self healing response. It carries a 30% effective value among any treatment when the patient thinks they are being treated (whether with a sugar pill or the real thing). So in essence doing anything gives the person a 30% success rate – a much higher rate then almost all western treatments for cancer. Wow, that is a scary fact. When the body is sick, diseased or off-balance, the body is the only thing that fixes whatever may have gone wrong and steers the body back to balance. When it comes to drugs it’s wrong to assume that prescription drug X when administered has corrected symptom Y. We don’t know that this effect proves the drug worked or that is was a mere coincidence and that the body healed itself. We never know. The pharmaceutical companies use what Anderson calls “rubber numbers” to manipulate studies to their benefit. He wants us to look at absolute numbers in studies and not the spinster relative numbers researchers use to skew results in their favor.

Having disempowered and denied people of a proper education on how to maintain proper health, they only can seek help from a white coat doctor with his magic chemical pills. And they have relatively little health care information about what foods make us sick. This is quite a nice pyramid of profits for the industrial food producers, their retail branches (Coca Cola, Dorittos, Cheesecake Factory, etc.), the health care industry, and big pharma.

Natural remedies show extermely positive results when the immune system has not been poisoned, especially when never having had any traditional toxic treatments. The reports from the otherside that claim that many of these natural remedies don’t work cannot be provided under the Freedom of Information Act when requested. This is because they don’t exist and never existed. Particularly in Dr. Max Gerson’s program his studies where suppressed. Harry Hoxsey was also venerated by the courts that his treatments where as effective as allopathic treatments without the toxic side effects. All of his treatment centers where closed down overnight when he refused to sell out to the AMA.

I will use treatments to help the sick. I will never use it to injure them or wrong them. I will not give poison to anyone.

– The Hippocratic Oath

What is cancer?

The malignant tumor is the expression that something is wrong – much like the idiot lights warning the driver that there is a problem in the car. If you turn off the lights – is the problem fixed? Does someone really only have cancer once the tumor appears? Cancer cells are circulatiing throughout your body at all times – we live with cancer. Your immune system is constantly destroying these cells. But it only takes one cell to escape detection for cancer to get a hold. Once it sets up shop – it takes about 8 years to reach 4 billion cells (about the time it becomes detectable by modern medicine). Instead of early detection we actually only have late detection methods. Doctors frighten the patient into a quick treatment when the reality is cancer is a very slow growing disease. It is about 10 years old once discovered and you’ve got about another 10-20 years before it will actually kill you.

Here is a list of the studies that show leaving cancer untreated you will live longer then if you treated patients with conventional therapies:
Jama, 1992, 257, p.2191
Lancet, 1991, August, p.901
NEJM, 1986, May 27, p. 967
NEJM, 1984, March, p. 737
Cancer, 1981, 47, p. 27
Jama, 1979, Feb 2, P. 489
A Report on Cancer, 1969, Hardin Jones

Healing Cancer is a must see documentary if you are facing the challenges and fears of a cancer diagnosis. There is hope out there if you educate yourself to the various natural, alternative, and preferably integrative treatments that involve the best of allopathic diagnostic medicine and the progressive treatments that look at the body as a global system that is self healing. Let thy food be thy medicine.

The Future Of Our Broken Health”care” System

August 13, 2009

2 Great videos from the site 10000Pennies:

How Effective is American Healthcare?

August 13, 2009

Dr. Jay Parkinson spits forth more brilliance about American Healthcare:

Healthcare delivery is a process. If we have no “System” to facilitate this process, that’s sort of like asking a bunch of disconnected, independent auto workers to find a place and come together on their own accord to build a ton of cars. Sure, they could build cars. It would take a ton of time and would be astronomically expensive, but it could be done. That’s sort of like healthcare in America. The ROI for a disconnected, perversely incented system shouldn’t even be measured. Like Obama says, “its kind of like the Special Olympics.”

This is based off of Umair Haque’s work on Harvardbusiness.org:

How much bang for the buck we really get in terms of life itself? I began with a measurement of Potential Years of Life Lost (PYLL). PYLL works like this: If a male lived to age 60, but average life expectancy was 69, 9 years of potential life would have been lost. PYLL is an interesting number to economists because it is a measure of opportunity cost: how much life is foregone in different healthcare systems.

Where does the United States stand compared to other countries? It loses the most potential years of life amongst developed countries. In the United States, 6397 years of life are lost per 100,000 males — compared to just 4574 in the United Kingdom, or 4018 in Italy.

life

The United States gets the smallest bang for the buck in terms of life itself amongst developed countries: it realizes the lowest level of “life returns.” The U.S. healthcare system returns the fewest life years for each dollar spent. The United States, for example, has invested an additional 8.3% of GDP in health since 1971. That investment yielded a PYLL reduction of 5157 years. America realized a return of 621 potential years of life gained for each additional percentage point of GDP invested in health.

life4.jpg